Thứ Tư, 27 tháng 2, 2013

CU L8R! Bosses allowed to fire by txt

IT'S OK for bosses to sack you by text message. Well, at least sometimes, according to the workplace watchdog.



View the original article here

Oil prices slide to January lows on Italy

Oil rig

Source: Supplied

GLOBAL crude oil prices have dived to fresh one-month lows as inconclusive Italian national elections sparked fresh economic uncertainty in the eurozone, dealers say.

Brent North Sea crude for delivery in April sank to $US112.61 per barrel - the lowest point since January 28. It stood at $US112.78, down $1.66 from yesterday's closing level, in later London deals.

New York's main contract, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) or light sweet crude for April, slid to $US91.92 a barrel - a trough last witnessed on January 4. The contract later pulled back to $US92.35, down 76 cents from yesterday.

"Crude oil prices gave back recent gains and slid lower on Tuesday (overnight), following the global downside momentum as uncertainty over the Italian elections limited risk appetite and left investors concerned that Europe's third largest economy may be heading for a hung parliament," said Sucden analyst Myrto Sokou.


"Thus, the focus has switched again to the European debt concerns, with Brent oil retreating back to $US113 per barrel, while WTI crude oil slides lower to retest $92 per barrel."

European equities slumped and the euro hit a near two-month dollar low overnight as dealers assessed the fallout of Italy's political impasse after elections in the indebted eurozone country.

A stronger greenback also makes dollar-priced crude more expensive for buyers using cheaper currencies, denting demand.

"There's a sea of red across trading screens... as the lack of a clear winner in the Italian elections is causing panic amongst investors," said analyst Angus Campbell at trading group Capital Spreads. "The result is a mass sell off of equities, in particular Italian and other banking stocks, the euro and pretty much any other risk asset you can think of."

A political deadlock loomed in Italy as it appeared Sunday's elections failed to produce a clear winner.

Polls show that while the leftists won the lower house, the party run by former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi had more seats in the upper house.

A majority in both chambers of parliament is required to form a government, leaving Italy in a state of limbo.

"Investors will focus their gaze on Italy's election results, which could see the eurozone's third largest economy face political deadlock in the coming months, casting doubt on further progress of economic reforms and rekindling eurozone fears," said analysts at Vienna-based oil consultancy JBC Energy.

"Meanwhile, the West and Iran will get another chance to lift the current stalemate, as talks begin in Almaty on Tehran's nuclear program.

"While the talks are unlikely to yield concrete results, any positive news from the meeting may exert downwards pressure on oil prices."

In Almaty, world powers and key crude producer Iran have exchanged offers in crunch talks aimed at breaking a decade of deadlock over Tehran's nuclear drive.

The two-day meeting comes as sanctions bite against the Islamic republic and Israel still refuses to rule out air strikes to knock out Iran's suspected nuclear weapons push.

The first round of closed-door talks started at around 0830 GMT after an initial bilateral meeting between the Chinese and Iranian delegations.

The world powers are offering Iran permission to resume its gold and precious metals trade as well as some international banking activity which are currently under sanctions, Western officials said.

But in exchange, Iran will have to limit sensitive uranium enrichment operations that the world powers fear could be used to make a nuclear bomb, the sources said.

Tehran insists its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful energy and medical uses.


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 26 tháng 2, 2013

Compo for coffee? A real pain in the tech

WORKERS who trip at home while checking email on a smartphone or scald themselves with a coffee while working on a laptop at a cafe could be entitled to workers' compensation.



View the original article here

James Hardie trims earnings forecast

BUILDING products group James Hardie has trimmed its earnings forecast for the year, saying conditions in the housing market remain uncertain.

The group today revealed it had made a net operating profit of $US31.5 million ($30.95 million) in the third quarter to December 31, up from a loss of $US4.8 million ($4.72 million) a year earlier.

The results include the company's asbestos-related costs, plus regulatory costs and tax adjustments.

Excluding those costs, operating profit rose to $US28.8 million ($28.29 million) from $US27.7 million ($27.21 million).

Chief executive Louis Gries said that while the US housing market had gained momentum, earnings growth had been constrained by lower sales prices and higher costs.

But, he said, if the US market continued its recovery, earnings were expected to rise.


However, conditions in Australia remained subdued and the group did not expect a substantial pickup soon.

The group downgraded its full year earnings forecast, excluding the asbestos and other costs, to between $US136 million ($133.61 million) and $US141 ($138.53) million.

James Hardie's net operating profit for the nine months to December 31, excluding asbestos and other costs, rose to $US113.1 million from $US109.3 million (to $111.12 million from $107.38 million). Including the costs, net operating profit fell seven per cent to $US123.6 million from $US115 million ($121.43 million from $112.98 million).

Mr Gries said that in anticipation of a market recovery in the US, James Hardie would expand its production capacity. It will spend $US34 million ($33.40 million) reconfiguring and refurbishing a plant in California, which it had closed in 2008 but now intends to reopen in 2014.

The group said that if it does not undertake any sharebuybacks between now and announcing its full year results in May, it planned to lift its dividend payout ratio. The final unfranked dividend for the year is expected to be 35 US cents, down from 38 US cents the previous year.


View the original article here

Do you need private health cover?

IS IT a worthwhile cause for your generation to spend money on private health insurance?

Gen Ys - Justine Davies

HEALTH insurance premiums are set to rise by an average of 5.6 per cent on April 1, so it's a timely question.

Let's answer it with a few other questions:

If you have a non life-threatening condition, are you prepared to spend up to 27 hours in the your public hospital's emergency department?

Are you prepared to wait four months to have your tonsils out, six months to have a knee replacement or three months for a hernia operation?

Are you willing to be financially penalised for not having insurance?

If you answered "no" to any of those questions, you probably should be spending money on private health insurance.

Don't get me wrong, our public system is fantastic if you have a life-threatening condition, but for anything else you'll face a wait and could be in a fair amount of pain during that time. That can impact on your employment, study and social life.

Then there's the lifetime health cover loading. Basically, you need to have hospital cover by the June 30 after your 31st birthday, otherwise you'll pay a 2 per cent loading for each extra year you delay.

Plus there's the 1- 1.5 per cent Medicare levy surcharge which, if you earn more than $84,000 and don't have private cover, will be levied against your income. You're damned if you do and damned if you don't!

If you're under age 26 and still studying or training, you might still be covered under your parents' health insurance policy. Confirm this with their fund. Otherwise, you're on your own.

Shop around, because premiums and coverage can vary. Try privatehealth.gov.au for more information.

Justine Davies is finance editor and commentator with financial research and ratings firm Canstar.

Gen Xs - Bruce Brammall

THE question ain't fair! I'm a financial adviser. How can I possibly say no?

And I wouldn't say no. But I will say, emphatically, the Federal Government is making it really hard to say "yes" for Gen Xers. It's a bigger grudge purchase than insurance normally is.

The Government just ticked off on premium increases of an average of 5.6 per cent - more than 2.5 times current inflation.

That came after the removal of 30 per cent rebates for higher-income earners from July.

For many, from April 1, health insurance will cost 50 per cent more than a year ago. It's an income bracket that will impact Gen Xers and Boomers more than most.

About 54 per cent of Australians have private health insurance.

But household finances are under pressure. And like in that scene in Flying High, occasionally the brown, stinky, stuff hits the fan, at speed. And when it's your health, you don't want to be on that trolley waiting for a hospital room.

If you earn in excess of $84,000 as a single or $168,000 for a couple, then you're going to have to pay the hefty Medicare surcharge if you don't have private health cover.

And then there's the age penalty. If you're over 31 years old, there's an extra 2 per cent extra a year.

Private health insurance cover is a horrendously frustrating and complex system.

But Gen Xers, more so than most, with our tin lids and our big mortgages and our finances stretched to within a tissue paper of snapping ... yeah, Gen Xers need health insurance. Right! Just bite your tongue and buy it.

Bruce Brammall is the author of Debt Man Walking and principal adviser with Castellan Financial Consulting.

Boomers - Mark Bouris

HEALTH insurance gets more expensive the older you get and as you age, there is much more likelihood that you're going to need it.

I know a lot of people who see the costs go up and they decide to cancel their private cover, leaving them at the mercy of the public hospital system. It's understandable: Boomers are transitioning to reduced incomes, private health gets more expensive and for those who are healthy, it seems like an waste of money. In my mind, your health is your greatest asset. It's something that too many of us take for granted, that is, until something happens.

As Boomers, you've probably saved for decades to create a good retirement. But how good will it be if you're not healthy enough to enjoy it?

As you age, you're probably going to start having more frequent health issues, from common problems such as knee replacements, vision correction and daily medications, to more severe illnesses. It's part of getting older.

I read an article by demographer Bernard Salt where he said about 8000 pacemakers are implanted each year into public and private patients in Australia, with each device costing between $5000 and $12,000. A pacemaker is a device that regulates the heartbeat, and it could easily add years to a patient's life.

However for a patient without private health insurance, the cost of that surgery could be a deal-breaker. I'd hate to think anyone would have to jeopardise their health in that way, but I know it happens.

My advice is that if you can afford it, you should hold on to your private health cover. It's inevitable that you're going to need it, and the peace of mind you'll get from knowing that you're covered is invaluable.

Mark Bouris is executive chairman of wealth management and advice firm Yellow Brick Road.

Retirees - Kerrin Falconer

THERE is no doubt about it, we have one of the best healthcare systems in the world.

While many may complain about waiting times and crowded corridors in certain hospitals, if anyone is seriously ill and needs attention, he or she pretty well gets it when it is needed. We have dedicated doctors and nursing staff in our hospitals. They work long hours, often over and above the call of duty.

Having said that, the public system has its limits. It can't possibly be all things to all men and women, as much as it tries.

In a perfect world, both public and private hospitals would be funded with a never-ending stream from the money tree that is Canberra.

But it isn't a perfect world and there are always budgets, balance sheets and bottom lines to restrict services and supplies.

Retirees are a bit like vintage cars. They both have a few clicks on the clock. They require frequent oil and grease changes, valve regrinds, new gearboxes or starter motors and sometimes need major overhauls. They usually work well on short runs but often strike trouble on extended trips.

They simply aren't as young as they used to be, but are still pretty darn good.

Those prepared for the upkeep of these beauties have made a choice and are prepared to pay what it takes to keep them in good running order.

Similarly, retirees need to make a choice as to whether they are prepared to join the queue and wait for whichever doctor is available when and where they need some reconditioning.Or they can use private health insurance to ensure they can get the mechanic and the garage they choose, when they want it.

It's not cheap, but then neither is maintaining vintage cars.

Kerrin Falconer is a finance writer with 15 years of financial planning experience.


View the original article here

How Italian voters sent markets plunging

Silvio Berlusconi

Former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi almost got re-elected sending markets into a frenzy. Picture: File Source: AFP

THE Italian election sent European stocks plummeting overnight. Former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi almost got re-elected, sending all the austerity measures implemented by Mario Moni into doubt.

A shock election result on Monday showed a surge in support for comedian Beppe Grillo’s anti-establishment campaign, as well as surprising support for former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

It is an indication of just how interconnected global markets are that the outcome of an election in a southern European country on the other side of the world could send shockwaves through to our local market.

European stockmarkets slumped overnight: Milan's FTSE MIB index tumbled 4.89 per cent and London's FTSE 100 index of leading companies fell 1.34 per cent.

Yesterday our own local market dived 1.2 per cent in early trade as a direct knock on from the Italian stalemate.


The reason: the Italian connection
Investors are concerned that the Italian people have voted in large numbers for a political party which is anti-austerity and anti-euro.

They were hoping for the liberal leader Pier Luigi Bersani to win which would allow him to form a coalition government with pro-austerity and current leader Mario Monti.

Instead the Italian people have staged somewhat of a "rebellion" and a push back against austerity.

The rebellion means a huge share of the vote has gone to Mr Berlusconi and Beppe Grillo, the populist comedian.

Although Mr Berlusconi’s party does not have enough to form a majority Government – it has sent the markets into a frenzy because of fear of contagion.

It puts doubts in investors’ minds about the Eurozone’s ability to emerge from its sovereign debt crisis and see through its austerity program in problem countries like Spain, Italy and Greece

The fear is that a divided parliament in Italy would make the implementation of the austerity medicine (cutting public debt and spending) more difficult and would put a spanner in the works of the European recovery project - something that makes markets very nervous.

Italy is Europe’s fourth largest economy and how it performs and who is in power matters.

It also suffers from a raft of economic problems common to other southern European countries, ranging from low growth to an inflexible labour market and high debt to GDP - making strong leadership a must if it is to face up to its debt issues, implement the necessary austerity measures and start to regain its competitiveness.

We should also bear in mind that markets around the world are coming down off recent record highs, driven up as some see it by governments pumping money into the system and over-excited investors inflating prices of late.

So it is not surprising that we see a strong pull back on uncertainty out of Europe. 

On the other hand it can be argued we are seeing a return in investor confidence and appetite.

However ongoing doubts over a Euro area recovery, unresolved fiscal cliff issues in the US, questions over growth in Japan and China mean markets will likely remain choppy for some time to come.
 


View the original article here

Dollar weaker on Italy stalemate

THE Australian dollar is more than half a US cent lower as concerns about Italy's political stalemate continue to weigh on markets.

At 12pm AEDT today, the currency was trading at 102.27 US cents, down from 102.83 US cents yesterday. It fell to 102.00 US cents early this morning, its lowest level since early October.

Westpac chief currency strategist Robert Rennie said markets were concerned about the results of Italian elections, which failed to produce a clear winner. Centre-left Democratic Party leader Pier Luigi Bersani scraped a razor-thin victory in the lower house of parliament but no party was able to win a majority in the senate.

"We've been very much dominated by offshore events," Mr Rennie said. "The suspense that now exists in Italy as we wait to see whether a coalition can be formed and, if so, how sustainable it is is something that continues to weigh."


Mr Rennie said that while developments in Italy and in the US, where automatic budget cuts are due to come into effect in March, unless Congress intervenes, would continue to weigh on the currency.

But he said that, with the currency now close to 102 US cents, it was likely to gain support from institutional investors.

"We haven't spent a great deal of time below that level in the past six or eight months so you would naturally expect to see some corporate demand and central bank demand for the Aussie," he said.

He said the key local driver for the currency over the next few days would be the release of official capital expenditure data for the December quarter tomorrow.

Meanwhile, Australian bond futures were stronger at noon. At 12pm AEDT today, the March 10-year bond futures contract was trading at 96.670 (implying a yield of 3.330 per cent) 96.645 up from (3.355 per cent), yesterday afternoon. The March three-year bond futures contract was at 97.280 (2.720 per cent), up from 97.260 (2.740 per cent) previously.


View the original article here